Both
a performative experiment and a design challenge, this project invites
you to make a meaningful commitment, provoking others to do the
same. Featuring commitments by:
Naomi
Ota
Stanley Archibald
Lelia Fleschin
Simon Thornton
Hélène Frichot
Paul Cook
Be inspired
to share what stimulates and motivates you to design the future
we will experience together.
Join
the Facebook group to participate or keep
updated through the mailing list.
NAOMI
OTA
I shall
try to see, feel and appreciate invisible beauties. And will create
visibles with this invisible preciousness.
NAOMI
OTA is a fibre installation artist based in Melbourne, Australia.
Her work is a complex cross-over between textile and contemporary
art. Her field also extends into theatrical installations. Ota has
been working with a dance performance/installation unit, Tony Yap
Company as a core member. Her understanding of culture as a native
of Japan and her international experience as a professional artist
have both contributed a unique cultural context to the discipline.
// TOP
STANLEY
ARCHIBALD
Today I
make a personal commitment to the future we design together
…by embracing intelligent design for a sustainable future.
STANLEY
ARCHIBALD, who has 30 years hairdressing experience in both
Australia and New Zealand, has designed and produced a range of
hand made chemical-free hair care products for his clients for the
past ten years. Fusing design sophistication with environmental
responsibility, their collection of hair care products offers conscience
free hair care. Archibalds’ shampoos, conditioners and styling
products are chemical free, essential oil based and are packaged
in eco-friendly recyclable containers. Archibalds' commitment to
a sustainable future extends to their salon services, which include
chemical free hair colouring and natural based treatments.
// TOP
LELIA
FLESCHIN
I am committed
to design and recycle new and old objects that I use daily in my
life.
The door handle made
of mice is a reaction to my husband's obsession with new IT stuff.
We have a lot of computer parts that he likes to combine and change.
He buys a lot of mice and I wanted to use them, rather than throw
them away. The mouse seem to be the access to new spaces online,
opening new windows, like door handles open new doors. This was
also part of a submission to a Lockwood competition. Also , it wasn’t
a winner, but I was flattered when the organisers sent me a mini-mouse
and USB as a complimentary gift. I think they liked my idea. Now
it is the door handle of our laundry door.
// TOP
SIMON
THORNTON
A future
where architectural fiction may be identified and enjoyed.
SIMON
THORNTON was born in 1953, studied architecture at the University
of Melbourne and is a partner of Simon and Freda Thornton Architects.
He has taught Design at Deakin University and has written occasionally
on architecture and heritage issues. Simon established the Architectural
Fiction Association, and a blog, to develop a theoretical basis
for a type of architecture which may be called ‘architectural
fiction’ or ‘fiction (or fictive) architecture’.
In the same way that a novel is a fictional text, (a pretence),
it is possible that a building can be a work of fiction. An example
from his own work is a house called The Aqueduct and Tent House
which is a copy (in timber) of an aqueduct with (metal) tents ‘hanging’
off it. Thematically it addresses issues of permanence and ephemerality,
heaviness and lightness, repetition and uniqueness, birth and death
– in a way which is similar to Milan Kundera’s novel
‘The Unbearable Lightness of Being’. Simon hopes to
bring together architects who are interested in architecture based
on imitation, pretence, trickery and playful deception, as an alternative
to most non-fictive architecture which may be categorised as clear,
honest, sincere and didactic.
// TOP
HÉLÈNE
FRICHOT
To design
less, and by using fewer resources. To not pursue design problems
that are not, in fact, pressing problems. For instance, to talk
eager clients out of unnecessary extensions and frenzies of home
improvement. To make the project of home a simple one that unfolds
slowly with time. To address real problems by way of discrete interventions,
and not through grandiose gestures. To think more, and to activate
thinking as a potential form of ethico-aesthetic engagement. To
invent new forms of sociability and new potentials for collective
enunciation. To think collectively toward the resolution of shared
problems – the shared problems that also divide us.
Dr HÉLÈNE
FRICHOT is a senior lecturer in the Program of Architecture,
RMIT University. While her first discipline is architecture, she
also
holds a PhD in philosophy . Hélène is co-curator of
Architecture+ Philosophy. Hélène’s research
is located in the transdisciplinary field of architecture and philosophy.
Her research maps the legacy of poststructuralist thought in the
experimental practices of digital architects, designers and artists.
Her current research is engaged in the combinatory of ethics and
aesthetics for digital architecture and how new techniques and technologies
open up new subjectivities and novel forms of community. Hélène’s
work has been published broadly both nationally and internationally.
Her research is broadly published as book chapters, in scholarly
and professional journals. With the assistance of an RMIT Research
Fellowship, Hélène is currently (2009) a Research
Fellow at ADIP (Architecture Design Innovation Program), Technische
Universität Berlin. And most importantly, Hélène
is the mama of two young boys, Felix and Florian, and she shares
her love and life with Rochus, their papa.
// TOP
PAUL
COOK
I
started out studying Architecture and Critical Theory because I
was interested how we incorporate Architecture into our world. I
am now intrigued how Architecture incorporates us into the world
and by whose devising.
PAUL COOK
started studying Architecture at the Georgia Institute of Technology
before transferring over onto studying Religion, Philosophy, and
Theology with a minor in Behavioural Science. His work since then
has gone onto embrace diverse spheres including having studied at
the Desmond Jones of Mime and Physical Theatre for two years and
working within several alternative theatre companies. It has also
bridged working with fringed alternative sub-cultures within our
current Western Society including living along side the New Travellers
within Britain for a year and a half. He has recently returned to
formal studies at the University of Nottingham to pursue a degree
in Architecture and Critical Theory. In so doing he hopes to take
up Henri Lefebvre’s challenge to reintegrate Architectural
Space within the larger category of Social Space to protect it from
being sliced off into Reductionism [Henri Lefebvre, The Production
of Space, p.104].
Be inspired
to share what stimulates and motivates you to design the future
we will experience together.
Join
the Facebook group to participate or keep
updated through the mailing list.
//
TOP
|
PAST
YEARS' PROGRAMS 2010 / 2009
/ 2008 / 2007 /
2006 / 2005
JOIN
THE MAILING LIST / ABOUT THE CURATORS
THIS YEAR'S PROGRAM
TWITTER: #archphil
Architecture
+ Philosophy provides a unique opportunity for a space of
exchange between the two disciplines. While what we provide
is a local space – Melbourne practitioners on Melbourne
issues – the Architecture and Philosophy series welcomes
speakers from any discipline to engage with questions of contemporary
urbanism, planning, technology, space, system, design, distribution
and other issues in the productive overlap between the two
disciplines. We curate a diverse range of presentations, from
research students and established academics to architecture
and planning practitioners, policy makers, public artists
and those working in the world between theory, buildings and
the city.
For all
enquiries, contact Esther
Anatolitis. Co-curator Dr
Hélène Frichot is on study leave in Germany
in 2009. New to the series as guest curator in 2008 was Chelle
Macnaughtan. about the curators |
|